Showing posts with label preprints. Show all posts
Showing posts with label preprints. Show all posts

Monday, August 01, 2022

Preprint of "On the Maximum Gonality of a Curve over a Finite Field" on the math arXiv

 

A preprint of my paper with Xander Faber and Everett Howe, "On the Maximum Gonality of a Curve over a Finite Field" has appeared on the math arXiv. This is the conclusion to the "Gonality Trilogy".


Monday, December 13, 2021

Preprint of "Only finitely many s-Cullen numbers are repunits for a fixed s≥2" on the math arXiv


A preprint of my paper with Michael Filaseta and Hester Graves, "Only finitely many s-Cullen numbers are repunits for a fixed s≥2" has appeared on the math arXiv. This is a sequel to an earlier paper with Hester, which proved that there were only finitely many solutions for all s, subject to the abc conjecture.

This proof is unconditional. I am now working on computations to extend 65536 to a much larger number -- it should be possible to get it into the millions.

Thursday, November 18, 2021

Preprint of "Finding a Widely Digitally Delicate Prime" available on the math arXiv

In September, I posted a preprint of "Finding a Widely Digitally Delicate Prime" on the math arXiv. It may not end up published in this form, but because it described the only known example of such a prime, and how I found it, I wanted to have it documented.





Friday, September 03, 2021

Preprint of "On Integers Whose Sum is the Reverse of their Product" available on the arXiv

 



The preprint of "On Integers Whose Sum is the Reverse of their Product", feat. Xander Faber is now available on the math arXiv.

Have you ever noticed that 9+9=18, while 9x9=81, which is 18 backwards? My co-author's kids did. The question of what other pairs of numbers a and b have a+b equal to axb backwards led us to write this paper. We give a technique for solving it in all bases. We have seen a list of these numbers in base 10 on the web, but we are aware of no other proof.

Wednesday, September 09, 2020

Preprint of "The abc Conjecture Implies That Only Finitely Many Cullen Numbers Are Repunits" on the arXiv

A preprint of "The abc Conjecture Implies That Only Finitely Many Cullen Numbers Are Repunits" is now available on the math arXiv. In it, Hester Graves and I show that if you assume the abc Conjecture, you can show that finitely many Cullen numbers are repunits to any base. (Sort of like it says in the title.)

Frequently Asked Questions (or so I imagine):

  1. What is the abc conjecture? It says that if you have integers a, b, and c with a+b=c, the product of all primes dividing a, b and c is almost never much smaller than c. For more, you can read the Wikipedia article.
  2. What are Cullen numbers? Cullen numbers are numbers of the form n2n+1, for a positive integer n.
  3. What are repunits? They are numbers all of whose digits are 1. So 111 or 1111. But! Those are base-10, and in this paper, we consider any base, so 7 is a repunit, because it is 111 in base 2. 2801 is a repunit, because it is 1111 in base 7. We don't allow 11, because every number has a base where it's 11.
  4. Does your result hold for s-Cullen numbers? Yes. For any given s, there are finitely many s-Cullen numbers that are repunits (assuming the abc conjecture).
  5. What are s-Cullen numbers? Numbers of the form nsn+1.
  6. When did you start using the abc conjecture? Just now! Hester had this cool idea, and it was fun to see how it worked out.

Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Sunday, September 15, 2019

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Preprint of "Brazilian Primes Which Are Also Sophie Germain Primes"

A preprint of "Brazilian Primes Which Are Also Sophie Germain Primes" is now available on the math arXiv. In it, Hester Graves and I disprove a conjecture from Schott's 2010 paper on Brazilian primes, namely that no Brazilian primes are also Sophie Germain primes.

What does this mean? A Brazilian prime is a prime number of the form 1+b+b2+...+bk-1, i.e. a prime whose digits are all 1 when written in base b. (To avoid silliness, you need k>2 and b>1.) For this reason, they are sometimes called "prime repunits".

A Sophie Germain prime is a prime p such that 2*p+1 is also prime.

If you just start computing Brazilian primes, most of them will be of length 3. We show that the length of a Brazilian Sophie Germain prime has to be a prime congruent to 2 mod 3, i.e. 5, 11, 17, 23, etc.

In the paper, we computed all Brazilian Sophie Germain primes up to 1044. There are 38,031,404 of them, all but 12 of them of length 5. The 12 exceptions are all of length 11. The smallest one of length 17 is 41969813142886369903423014255641324842178685773056721, which is bigger than 1052.

We have actually computed all Brazilian Sophie Germain primes up to 1046 (there are 104,890,302 of them) and 1048 (we haven't counted them up yet). A later version of the preprint will reflect that.

Submission of the sequence of Brazilian Sophie Germain primes is in progress. A later version of the preprint will also reflect that.

Sunday, September 08, 2013

Updated version of "Constructing Carmichael numbers through improved subset-product algorithms"

A new version of "Constructing Carmichael numbers through improved subset-product algorithms" has been posted to the math arXiv.

From the comments: "Table 1 fixed; previously the last 30 digits and number of digits were calculated incorrectly." This now better matches the version that will appear in Math. Comp.

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

New Version of "There Are Infinitely Many Perrin Pseudoprimes"

I have reformatted There Are Infinitely Many Perrin Pseudoprimes (sometimes known as "There Are Infinitely Many Frobenius Pseudoprimes"). It now uses a more modern version of the TeX typesetting package. I also re-submitted it for publication after only 6 or 7 years. I think it holds up, though!